Back to Entertainment

Irish stew

Ingredients don't always mix in "Cripple"

Photo courtesy of www.plu.edu

Recommend Article
Total Recommendations (0)
Clip Article Email Article Print Article Share Article

Pacific Lutheran University's production of the bizarre Irish play The Cripple of Inishmaan begins with promise. From line one, Clare Edgerton and Anne Olsen are thoroughly amusing as a pair of tut-tutting shop owners, Eileen and Kate. Travis Tingvall is instantly irksome as the local crier of consistently boring news Johnnypateenmike O'Dougal - yes that is the name in the program. Jordan Beck makes the thickheaded, sweets-loving Bartley McCormick oddly, if dimly, endearing. And Joseph Baken shows remarkable dedication to Billy Claven, a role that requires him to shuffle uncomfortably about the stage for most of two hours as the title character.

So, with so much praise to spread around among members of the cast, I should not have walked out of Eastvold Auditorium feeling nothing but annoyance over the waste of my last two and a half hours on a Saturday night.

Every single character in The Cripple of Inishmaan is on some level horrible to at least one other character. And not one of them exhibits any genuine remorse over their behavior. They do mean things, talk behind each other's backs, and administer pummelings left and right - and not in the name of entertainment or drama.

Brian Desmond's director's notes tell the reader that playwright Martin McDonagh "blends pathos and humor in surprising and unsettling ways, while creating characters that are memorable precisely because they are both larger than life and deeply human."

This is basically true, but I suspect Desmond meant it in a more positive light than what was ultimately delivered at PLU. Scenes jump helter skelter through the dichotomy of silly banter to insults and beatings with a rapidity that leaves the viewer wondering if they are meant to laugh at the cruelty, stoically ignore the jokes - or some bizarre combination of the two.

This struggle between styles is mirrored in the play's inability to end, as it struggles through a myriad of reasonable finales, waffling from moderately happy to crushingly depressing and back until this baffled reviewer was left settling for whatever end brought the final blackout, simply so there would be no more.

The result is a moderately effective short piece, with a second act that feels shoddily tacked on to satisfy the writer's need for a twist ending - only to be trapped in a frustrating spiral as he fails to stop twisting for the next half hour.

The last time I gave positive actor reviews blemished by unenjoyable writing, I was informed later that I simply did not understand the theater. I don't buy it. Some shows simply cannot be sold by any quality of thespian. Some shows are bland and muddled and struggle to manufacture meaning simply by being different.

There are plenty of worthwhile performances by clearly talented actors on display in Inishmaan, but the play itself spends so much time struggling to be both lightheartedly entertaining and darkly emotional that it fails to achieve anything beyond an ironic twist on Johnnypateenmike's lifelong bane: a futile attempt to be liked and un-boring.

[Eastvold Auditorium, March 19-20 7:30 p.m., $5-$8, Pacific Lutheran University, 12180 Park Ave. S., Tacoma, 253.535.7325]

Read next close

Listings

South Sound Music Calendar: Friday, March 19

Comments for "Irish stew" (3)

Weekly Volcano is not responsible for the content of these comments. Weekly Volcano reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.

User Photo

Ashley said on Mar. 17, 2010 at 8:24pm

No disrespect meant, but this is a review of the script and it should have been a review of a production.

User Photo

Joe Izenman said on Mar. 18, 2010 at 10:39am

My intent, as I feel is the purpose of a reviewer in the first place, was to communicate my experience watching the play, and how I think it translates to whether other people-whomever wishes to trust my opinion-will enjoy attending, in order to help them decide whether it is worth their time and money. In this case, despite the best efforts of the cast, the script made the entire production so unpleasant for me that I could not reasonably recommend the experience to anyone.

I focused on the script because it was the facet of production that had the strongest effect on my opinion. The same would be true of a mediocre production of, say, Hamlet, with a standout, stellar, lead. Whatever makes that strongest impression and most colors the experience becomes the most important thing to talk about.

I wish all the cast and crew the best in their later endeavors, as there are plenty of talented people involved. But this show in particular made me roll my eyes in frustration every time it failed to end, and sent me home annoyed that I had sat through it, and I believe glossing over that would be disingenuous at best.

User Photo

Carv said on Mar. 18, 2010 at 12:12pm

In Joe's defense, he did praise several aspects of the performance, and McDonagh's a rough go for some. I think he's brilliant, personally, but his work can make for a very glum night in the theatre.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a Weekly Volcano Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own Weekly Volcano Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Site Search