Back to Stage

A mess of plays

SPSCC'S "Durang/Durang" brings to mind the term "clustermug"

Recommend Article
Total Recommendations (0)
Clip Article Email Article Print Article Share Article

Much of New Jersey playwright's Christopher Durang's work can be described as "the comedy of disorientation."  Much like the comedy of social awkwardness popularized in the U.S. by the British version of The Office, Durang's writing requires exquisite precision in tone and pacing or it falls apart completely.  The audience has to feel confident that it's the characters who feel disoriented, not the actors, and we certainly shouldn't wonder if their director knows what's going on.  One wrong move, and the whole production looks like a train wreck ...  which brings me, I'm afraid, to South Puget Sound Community College's presentation of Durang/Durang.

There were folks in the audience who loved every minute.  I suspect many were proud parents but, be that as it may, there was much to enjoy.  Durang/Durang is an anthology of short comedies; producer Don Welch chose several from that script and a few from separate collections of Durang's 20-century oeuvre.  These were assigned to brother Ron Welch and two student directors, Kasinda Starmer and Eric Colin Nast.  Wisely, the last sketch presented was the most amusing:  "The Hardy Boys and the Mystery of Where Babies Come From."  Somehow, it's even funnier than its title.  If only the rest of the show had been as polished as this piece and Starmer's set design.

I review college theatre with hesitation.  I was a freshman theatre student once upon the '90s, and I know how fragile the adolescent ego can be.  Roger Ebert has the advantage of critiquing actors who've completed their training and earned millions of dollars for their work.  I do not.  I'm reviewing the efforts of 18-year-old beginners, so I'm obliged to strike a balance between negative but constructive criticism and timid palliation.  My aim will be to err slightly on the side of kindness.

Of the 23 actors in the cast, at least a handful showed real promise, so I can offer warm encouragement to Kelsey Preston, mesmerizingly self-loathing as "Woman Stand-Up;" Noah Lundquist, drawling through a parody of Laura from The Glass Menagerie; Jeanine Kuehn, bellowing for control of "The Actor's Nightmare;" and Preston Crawford and Zach Holstine as "The Hardy Boys."  If only the overall production had offered them better support.  I learned a euphemism from Stephen King's Under the Dome that's appropriate here:  "clustermug."

The intermission, for example, was scheduled for 10 minutes.  Friday, it was more like two.  I wondered if this was a ploy to disorient the audience, but if so, it was a too-clever move that stranded patrons in the restroom.  In Act II, a technician hung from the light booth like an Audio-Animatronic pirate through much of "1-900-Desperate."  A pointlessly ribald musical intro to "Phyllis and Xenobia" was downright embarrassing.  Saddest of all, Durang/Durang was written to parody 1980s Broadway, a time before any of these students were born - so their ignorance of playwrights like Sam Shepard, while understandable, erased the central joke of the anthology.  I question the choice of this material for a freshman class of acting and directing students, as they had little chance of getting the joke - and it wasn't their fault.

I find it sadly germane that several of these pieces were grabbed from a 1996 collection called A Mess of Plays by Chris Durang; as, for most of Friday night's performance, that's exactly what I watched being made.

[South Puget Sound Community College - Kenneth J. Minnaert Center for the Arts, Durang/Durang, through March 7, 8 p.m. Thursday-Saturday, 2 p.m. Sunday, $12.50, 2011 Mottman Rd. SW, Olympia, 360.596.5411]

Read next close

Listings

South Sound Music Calendar: Tuesday, March 9

Comments for "A mess of plays" (2)

Weekly Volcano is not responsible for the content of these comments. Weekly Volcano reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.

User Photo

Noah Lundquist said on Mar. 09, 2010 at 12:49am

I believe that your attempt at constructive criticism was insufficient.

I by no means believe that you didn't make points that were valid (Durang's subject matter is quite esoteric for not only students, but layman viewers alike), but your general tone belies the implied benevolence of your third paragraph. Hell, to say that you are oscillating between "negative but constructive criticism" and "timid palliation" essentially implies the same thing: You thought it was terrible; something to be mitigated or cured rather than reviewed. Though one should never censor oneself, I must question the wisdom of using the term "downright embarassing" to describe the efforts of "18-year-old beginners" (actually ranging in age from 17 to 30+, but I know that hyperbole is necessary in order to be succinct).

For my part, I will not deny that the production was not rife with some degree of "amateurism": many actors were new, many liberties were taken with dialog, and a great deal of cast changes occurred late in production. However, we gave it what we had, and I, personally, would have liked more comments in the vein of sincere critique of methodology, practice and production performed of the people involved rather than (as I and others who have read this have gleaned) a presumed preoccupation with age and education. I need no training to smell condescension.

User Photo

Carv said on Mar. 09, 2010 at 8:05am

Noah, this was such a reasonable, respectful analysis that I'd like to reply in kind and at some length, which wouldn't be politic here. If you'd like to drop me an email at Carv@ChristianCarvajal.com, however, I'd be happy to get back to you when I have some free time. What I will say publicly is this, and it applies to any review or article: I get 550 words to describe and dissect two hours worth of material. That doesn't leave a whole lot of room for nuance. Also, ANY review is an act of condescension, which Merriam-Webster defines as the assuming of "an air of superiority." To criticize assumes an air of superiority, in that it says, "I know more than you do so I'm going to tell you what you did right and wrong." Well, the fact is, Noah, I do know more about theatre than most amateurs or students. That's not a character flaw, it's my qualification for the job.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a Weekly Volcano Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own Weekly Volcano Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Site Search